Skip to main content
Threats

Understanding Attack Chains: How Multi-Stage Exploits Bypass Traditional Defenses

Modern attackers chain multiple vulnerabilities together to breach networks. Learn how exploit paths work and why visualizing attack chains is critical for defense.

11 min readBy Phillip Williams

You patched the “critical” issues. You addressed the high severity findings. You have a vulnerability report that looks reassuring.

Then an incident happens anyway. That is not rare. Modern attackers do not need one perfect vulnerability. They chain together multiple weaknesses, often including items that look “low severity” in isolation.

Understanding attack chains is the difference between fixing a long list of findings and reducing real breach risk.

Why severity alone fails

Severity scores are useful, but they are not context. What matters is whether a weakness sits on a path to something important. A medium-severity misconfiguration that appears in many paths to privileged access can be more dangerous than a critical vulnerability on an isolated system.

Attack chain thinking shifts the question from “How bad is this vulnerability?” to “What can an attacker do next if they get this far?”

What is an attack chain

An attack chain (sometimes called an exploit path) is a sequence of steps an attacker takes to reach an objective. Each step leverages a different weakness: a credential, a misconfiguration, a trust relationship, an exposed service.

The chain is what makes breaches possible. The individual links are what make breaches preventable.

A simple example (how small issues become a breach)

Here is a simplified chain that shows up in many environments. None of the individual steps are unusual. The power is in the combination.

  1. Initial access: an employee enters credentials on a phishing page.
  2. Foothold: the attacker uses those credentials to access a VPN that does not require MFA.
  3. Execution: from inside the network, the attacker finds an internal application with a known weakness and gains code execution.
  4. Privilege escalation: a service account has excessive permissions, enabling access to more sensitive systems.
  5. Impact: data theft, ransomware, or disruption becomes possible.

If you only prioritize by severity, you will tend to fix the “critical” app issue and miss the stronger break points: MFA, segmentation, and service account permissions.

MITRE ATT&CK (a useful map for chain thinking)

The MITRE ATT&CK framework provides a shared language for attacker behavior. Instead of thinking in products, you think in tactics and techniques: how attackers get in, move, escalate, and achieve impact.

You do not need to memorize the matrix to benefit from it. Use it to ask better questions: where is our initial access risk highest, what enables lateral movement, and what would an attacker do after they gain a foothold?

How to analyze paths (a practical approach)

Attack path analysis is straightforward when you keep it grounded in your environment. Start with visibility, then map trust and access, then validate.

  1. Map what exists: assets, identity systems, remote access paths, and trust relationships.
  2. Define crown jewels: the systems where compromise would be most damaging.
  3. Enumerate realistic paths: look for sequences of steps an attacker could actually take.
  4. Prioritize by path risk: fix the choke points that break many chains at once.
  5. Validate continuously: confirm that the paths you modeled match reality as the environment changes.

How to break the chain

The best part of attack chains is that you do not need to fix every link to reduce risk. Breaking one key link can stop the entire path.

High-leverage break points usually include:

  • MFA on external access: reduces initial access success rates dramatically.
  • Segmentation and least privilege: makes lateral movement harder and limits blast radius.
  • Credential hygiene: reduces privilege escalation paths and account takeover.
  • Detection that routes action: catches attackers before they reach impact.

For continuous attack path validation and prioritization, explore Senthrex. Delivered through Red Team Suite, it helps teams see how issues connect into exploitable paths and focus on the fixes that matter most.

See your attack paths

Senthrex helps map exploit paths and validate what breaks the chain as your environment changes.

Discover Senthrex

Written by

Phillip Williams

Phillip Williams

Co-Founder & CTO

Phillip Williams is a Google Hall of Fame hacker and veteran security engineer. He has discovered critical vulnerabilities across global platforms and holds multiple patents in streaming and microservice infrastructure. He has founded and scaled several cybersecurity startups and built systems that protect millions of users worldwide. At TechSlayers, he leads architecture and product innovation, designing technology that makes isolation fast, invisible, and secure.